Evaluation of Foot Deformities in Patients with Ingrown Nails
³»¼º ¹ßÅé ȯÀÚÀÇ ¹ß ±âÇü Æò°¡
Nihal Sar©¥, Gülcan Saylam Kurtipek, Mehmet Ünal, Mehmet Öztürk, İlker Fatih Sar©¥
Dermatol Pract Concept. 2024;14(1): e2024049 doi: 10.5826/dpc.1401a49
¸ñÀû: ³»Ç⼺ ¹ßÅé (ingrown nail)¿¡¼ ÇغÎÇÐÀû ¹ß¸ð¾ç°ú °ü·Ã ÀÖ´Ù´Â º¸°í°¡ ÀÖÀ½¿¡ µû¶ó, ÀÌ ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ÁÖ¿ä ¸ñÀûÀº radiological parameter¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© ¹ß º¯ÇüÀÌ ³»Ç⼺ ¹ßÅé¿¡ Áß¿äÇÑ ¿ªÇÒÀ» ÇÏ´ÂÁö È®ÀÎÇÏ°íÀÚ ¿¬±¸¸¦ ÁøÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù.
¹æ¹ý: ³»Ç⼺ ¹ßÅé Áø´ÜÀ» ¹ÞÀº 64¸íÀÇ È¯ÀÚ¿Í ³»Ç⼺ ¹ßÅé ÀÌ·ÂÀÌ Àü¹«ÇÑ ´ëÁ¶±º ȯÀÚ 71¸íÀÌ Æ÷ÇԵǾú´Ù. µÎ ±×·ì ¸ðµÎ ¾çÃø ¹ß Xray¸¦ ÅëÇØ ¹«Áö¿Ü¹Ý (hallux valgus angle -HVA, interphalangeal angle -IPA, and intermetatarsal angle -IMA) °ú ÆíÆòÁ·(calcaneal pitch angle -CPA, talohorizontal angle -THA, and talometatarsal angle -TMA)À» Æò°¡Çß´Ù.
°á°ú: ´ëÁ¶±º°ú ºñ±³ÇßÀ» ¶§ HVA, IPA ¹× IMAÀÇ ¹«Áö¿Ü¹Ý ¹æ»ç¼±ÇÐÀû ÃøÁ¤°ú CPA ¹× TMA ÀÇ ÆíÆòÁ· ¹æ»ç¼±ÇÐÀû ÃøÁ¤¿¡¼ À¯ÀǹÌÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ¹ß°ßµÇÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù. ´Ù¸¸, THA´Â ´ëÁ¶±º¿¡¼ Åë°èÀûÀ¸·Î À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô ´õ ³ô¾Ò´Ù (P = 0.025). ³»Ç⼺ ¹ßÅé ´Ü°è¿Í Æò¹ß Áø´ÜÀ» À§ÇÑ ÃøÁ¤µÈ TMA »çÀÌ¿¡´Â moderate strength positive relationshipÀÌ ÀÖ¾úÁö¸¸ (rho = 0.326; P = 0.04), ³»Ç⼺ ¹ßÅé ´Ü°è¿Í ´Ù¸¥ parameter »çÀÌ¿¡´Â À¯ÀǹÌÇÑ »ó°ü°ü°è°¡ ¾ø¾ú´Ù.
°á·Ð: ¹«Áö¿Ü¹Ý°ú ³»¼º¹ßÅé°£¿¡ »ó°ü°ü°è´Â ¾ø¾úÀ¸³ª, Pes planus foot deformity´Â ³»Ç⼺ ¹ßÅé ȯÀÚ¿¡°Ô µ¿¹ÝµÉ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù.
Comment: ÀÓ»ó¿¡¼, ¹Ýº¹µÇ´Â ingrown toenail·Î ÇǺΰú Ä¡·á ÈÄ, Æò¹ßÁø·á·Î Á·ºÎ Ŭ¸®´Ð¿¡ ÀǷڵǴ °æ¿ì°¡ ÀÖ´Ù. Àç¹ß·Î ÇǺΰú¿¡¼ ¼öȸ óġ¸¦ ¹ÞÀº ³»Ç⼺ ¹ßÅéÀÇ °æ¿ì ±× Á¤µµ°¡ ½ÉÇÏ´Ù ÆǴܵǸç, »ó±â ¿¬±¸¿¡ ´ëÀÔÇغ¸¸é pes planus Á¤µµµµ ½ÉÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù. ÀÌ·² °æ¿ì ÀçÈ°¿îµ¿°ú ÀûÀýÇÑ º¸Á¶±â ó¹æÀ¸·Î Àû±ØÀû pes planus¸¦ Ä¡·áÇØÁØ´Ù¸é ³»¼º ¹ßÅéÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇÑ È¯ÀÚÀÇ ºÒÆí°¨À» ÁÙÀÏ ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀ¸·Î ±â´ëµÈ´Ù.